Meaning To Read

ulysses-on-deckUlysses. It’s one of those books that has always been on that long list of books I “ought to read” but wasn’t terribly keen on reading. I had been told repeatedly — by many English teachers and professors — that it was a difficult book to read so I had steered clear.

For the last little while at work, it has been the book that is “on deck” — I’ve been scanning an early two volume edition page by page at high resolution and, as often happens, I’ve been reading bits of the text as I am setting up and editing pages. It’s different, for sure, but not really that difficult, especially by modern standards. So I have decided to add it to my “to read” list instead of my “ought to read” list.

I’m not the only person with a “meaning to/ought to read” list of course. Most people have one, and many bluff their way through conversations pretending to have read various important texts. BookRiot has a great list of 20 books most commonly on the pretend-to-have-read list. Here’s the books, annotated with my thoughts:

 

  1. Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (85 mentions) — I have tried. Really. Three or four times but I just don’t like Austen’s style. I will probably never read this one.
  2. Ulysses by James Joyce — see above
  3. Moby-Dick by Herman Melville — again, I tried. Ick.
  4. War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy — nope. No interest.
  5. The Bible — I have read the complete Old Testament (chapter and verse; I read it when I was in England) and most of the New Testament, as well as most of the Apocrypha.
  6. 1984 by George Orwell — had to read this for school; re-read it a few years later; eager to read it again! Surprised Brave New World isn’t on this list, too. I read and re-read it in the same years.
  7. The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien — yeah, another style-clash. I tried even after failing to make it through The Hobbit, but I just don’t like Tolkien’s wordiness.
  8. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald — never bothered to try. Nothing against it; if it was on a bookshelf where I was in a cabin, or something, I’d give it a shot.
  9. Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy — Tolstoy again? No interest.
  10. Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger — read it in my “rebellious teen” phase. Didn’t love it, didn’t hate it. Most of the plot is long-vanished from my memory.
  11. Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace — familiar with the title but otherwise no clue about this one.
  12. Catch-22 by Joseph Heller — another one I read in my late teens and have mostly forgotten.
  13. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee — read for school and loved it; mostly remember it now because I’ve also watched the movie a few times.
  14. Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James — if you ever see me reading this, please slap it out of my hand. I’ve read parts of it — enough to know that the writing is middling and the plot causes headaches from all the eye-rolling.
  15. Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte — like Austen, I can’t cope with the writing style of the Bronte sisters (or most books of that era).
  16. Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky — another Russian novel that has never made it past the trivia stage in that I can match the author to the title. Never even considered trying this one.
  17. Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte — see comment on Jane Eyre, above.
  18. Great Expectations by Charles Dickens — I’ve finished very little Dickens over the years, this is not one. Again, it’s his wordiness that gets in my way of enjoying his work.
  19. Harry Potter (series) by J.K. Rowling — I read every one of them, though it took me a few years to start, by the last book, I was lined up on release day to buy a copy.
  20. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens (21 mentions) — this is one of the Dickens books I finished; I had to read it for a history course though, which made it much more interesting to me as I was reading it not for structure or character development but for historical flavour.

2013-08-03 12.10.26It’s admittedly a short list but I look at those 100-books lists, like Guardian’s Top 100 Books of All Time, and start to see some overlap as well as a few other titles I can add to my never-read-and-probably-won’t list like One Hundred Years of Solitude, The Tin Drum and  Leaves of Grass (I tried that one. Ugh, no.).

I also have a “try again” list — some of those are pictured, right — books I’ve either never managed to finish or have read but forgotten significant portions.

It comes down to this: like food, reading is a very personal thing. Just like I would never seriously mock someone for not liking a common food (How can you not like strawberry jam! Everyone loves strawberry jam!), I am not going to condemn someone for never having read an “important” book. Of course, I might raise my eyebrow if my BS meter goes off while you’re bluffing…

 

Comments are closed.